Persepsi Risiko Masyarakat Terdampak Dalam Upaya Mitigasi Dampak Kabut Asap Riau

  • Nurul Aiyuda Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Abdurrab

Abstract

Mitigasi merupakan upaya yang dilakukan untuk mengurangi dampak kabut asap. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara persepsi risiko terhadap upaya mitigasi dampak asap di Riau. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah 201 individu yang terkena dampak kabut asap, yang diambil menggunakan purposive sampling. Lokasi pada penelitian ini adalah kota Pekanbaru, yang dikelilingi oleh tiga daerah sumber kabut asap, meliputi Kampar, Pelalawan dan Siak. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan skala mitigasi dan skala persepsi risiko. Studi ini menemukan bahwa persepsi risiko memberikan kontribusi terhadap mitigasi dampak asap dengan signifikansi p<0,001 dan r 0,293. Dalam penelitian ini, mitigasi masyarakat cenderung rendah, sejalan dengan rendahnya persepsi masyarakat dalam menilai risiko dampak kabut asap Riau.

References

Aiyuda, N., & Koentjoro. (2017). Hubungan antara Persepsi Risiko dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terdampak terhadap Otoritas dalam Upaya Mitigasi Dampak Kabut Asap Riau. Gadjah Mada Journal Of Psychology, 2(2), 101–112. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamajop/article/download/33094/19976.

Benson, C., Twigg, J., & Rossetto, T. (2007). Perangkat untuk mengarusutamakan pengurangan risiko bencana : Catatan panduan bagi Lembaga-lembaga yang bergerak dalam bidang pembangunan (CIRCLE Indonesia, Terjemahan). (T. Wuryantari, Ed.). Yogjakarta: Hivos Kantor Regional Asia Tenggara dan CIRCLE Indonesia. (di cetak ulang dari Tool for mainstreaming disaster risk

reduction : Guidancce notes fo development organisations,2007, Switzerland : the ProVention Consortium).
BNPB. (2013). Ketangguhan bangsa dalam menghadapi bencana. Gema BNPB, 4(2).
Retrieved from https://www.bnpb.go.id/uploads/migration/pubs/587.pdf.

BNPB (Badan penanggulangan bencana). (2013). Rencana kontinjensi nasional menghadapi ancaman bencana asap akibat kebakaran hutan dan lahan. Jakarta: BNPB. Retrieved from https://www.bnpb.go.id/uploads/publication/597/rencana_kontijensi.pdf.

Brenkert-smith, H., Champ, P. A., & Flores, N. (2012). Trying not to get burned: Understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors. Environmental Management, 50(6), 1139–1151. doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9949-8.

Brenkert-smith, H., Champ, P. A., & Telligman, A. L. (2013). Understanding change : Wildfire in Larimer country, Colorado. Res. Note RMRS-RN-58. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 46 p.

Brenkert-smith, H., Meldrum, J. R., & Champ, P. A. (2015). Climate change beliefs and hazard mitigation behaviors : homeowners and wild fi re risk, 14(4), 341–360. doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2015.1080656.

Chaiken, S., & Ledgerwood, A. (2012). A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology-Volume 2 (pp. 246– 265). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V, & Winter, D. D. N. (2001). Peace, Conflict, and Violence. (D. J. Christie, R. V Wagner, & D. D. N. Winter, Eds.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Dake, K. (1992). Myths of Nature : Culture and the Social Construction of Risk, 48(4), 21–37.

Dickinson, K., Brenkert-smith, H., & Flores, N. (2015). Catching fire? social interactions, beliefs, and wildfire risk mitigation behaviors. Society and Natural Resources, 28, 807–824. http://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1037034.

Faisal, F., Yunus, F., & Harahap, F. (2012). Dampak asap kebakaran hutan pada pernapasan. CDK-189, 39(1), 31–35. Retrieved from http://www.kalbemed.com/Portals/6/10_189Dampak Asap Kebakaran Hutan pada Pernapasan.pdf.

Helena, V. M. (2009). Indonesian Perspectives on Managing the Asean Haze. Jurnal Sarjana, 24(1), 83–101.

Herawati, H., & Santoso, H. (2011). Tropical forest susceptibility to and risk of fire under changing climate: A review of fire nature, policy and institutions in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(4), 227–233. doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.006.

Ho, M., Shaw, D., Lin, S., & Chiu, Y. (2008). How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Analysis, 28(3), 635–643. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539- 6924.2008.01040.x.

Kemenkes RI. (2015). Masalah kesehatan akibat kabut asap kebakaran hutan dan lahan tahun 2015. InfoDATIN : Pusat Data Dan Informasi Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Retrieved from http://www.depkes.go.id/article/view/16010500006/masalah- kesehatan-akibat-kabut-asap-kebakaran-hutan-dan-lahan-tahun-2015.html.

Lin, S., & Shaw, Æ. D. (2008). Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public ? Nat Hazards, 44, 305–314. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9136-z.

Martin, I. M., Bender, H., & Raish, C. (2007). What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: The case of wildland fires. Risk Analysis, 27(4), 887– 900. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00930.x

McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Personal experience and the “psychological distance” of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109–118. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.003.

Meldrum, J. R., Champ, P. A., Brenkert-Smith, H., Warziniack, T., Barth, C. M., & Falk, L. C. (2015). Understanding gaps between the risk perceptions of wildland-urban interface (WUI) residents and wildfire professionals. Risk Analysis, 35(9), 1746–1761. doi.org/10.1111/risa.12370.

O’Neill, M. (2013). “Learned helplessness” leaves people in major cities uprepared to cope in natural disaster. Latine, 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-22/city-slickers-unable-to-cope-with- disasters/5038800.

Renn, O. (2004). Perception of risks. Toxicology Letter, 149, 405–413. doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.051.

Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance Coping with Uncertainty in a Complec Word.
London . Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

Renn, O., & Rohrmann, B. (Eds.). (2000). Cross-Cultural risk perception : A survey of empirical studies. Stuttgart and Melbourne: Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V.

Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. (R. E. Lofstedt, Ed.). UK and USA: Taylor & Francis.

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Sarah. (1982). Why study risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2(2).
Spence, a., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience [Letter]. Nature Climate Change, 1(4), 46–49. doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059.

Steg, L., & Sievers, I. (2000). Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behavior, 32(2), 250–269. doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972513.

Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 197–207. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001.

Truelove, H. B., & Parks, C. (2012). Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 246–259. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.002.

Varkkey, H. (2007). Patronage politics, plantation fires and transboundary haze. Environmental Hazards, 12(3–4), 200–217. doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2012.759524.

Wildavsky, A., Dake, K., & Darwin, C. (2016). Theories of Risk Perception : Who Fears What and Why ?, 119(4), 41–60.
Published
2018-08-09
How to Cite
AIYUDA, Nurul. Persepsi Risiko Masyarakat Terdampak Dalam Upaya Mitigasi Dampak Kabut Asap Riau. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Call For Paper Peranan Psikologi Bencana Dalam Mengurangi Risiko Bencana, [S.l.], p. 122-130, aug. 2018. Available at: <http://www.new-ejournal.unbi.ac.id/index.php/semnaspsikologibencana/article/view/70>. Date accessed: 07 july 2020.